Translate

Guide to Patagonia's Monsters & Mysterious beings

I have written a book on this intriguing subject which has just been published.
In this blog I will post excerpts and other interesting texts on this fascinating subject.

Austin Whittall


Showing posts with label footprint. Show all posts
Showing posts with label footprint. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 7, 2019

Oldest human footprint in the Americas, in Chile 16 Kya


A paper published in PLOS (Moreno K, Bostelmann JE, Macías C, Navarro-Harris X, De Pol-Holz R, Pino M (2019) A late Pleistocene human footprint from the Pilauco archaeological site, northern Patagonia, Chile. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0213572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213572) reports finding the "oldest human footprint" in America, North or South.


Pilauco, is close to Osorno, in Chile's Patagonian Lake District. This site is very close (60 miles away) to the Monte Verde site, where ancient remains (Pre-Clovis) were found, but their age was questioned.


The team's dating places this footprint at 15,600 years ago. And this is indeed older than any other human footprint in America.


The interesting part is that its age challenges theories about the peopling of America, which had suggested that modern humans entered America some 13,000 years ago.


Here we have a footprint far older than that date, and far, far away from Beringia!


Why should we assume that they were new arrivals? Couldn't these people have reached Chile 20, 25 or even 100 Kya?


See this video on the footprint:



More findings will clarify our doubts.


Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2019 by Austin Whittall © 

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Toluquilla Footprint; is it erectus?

 
erectus footprint in mexico
Toluquilla footprint in Mexico. From [1]

Close to Lake Valsequillo, a site where ancient stone tools have been found (predating the appearance of modern humans in Africa), is Cerro Tolquilla, a volcano that erupted some forty thousand years ago.

In its ashes, a “human” footprint can be seen, which has been been dated to 38,000 +/- 8,570 years ago.[1]

However there is some controversy regarding the age of this “Xalnene” ash. Because Renne et al (2005) [2] published an article in the prestigious journal Nature where they “dated the Xalnene Ash but with startlingly different results” as they “document that this ash is much older at 1.3 Ma years based on single grain Ar-Ar dating and they suggest that the footprints cannot be human, because of the age but are the result of quarrying operation” [1]

In Renne’s words: [2]

Here we show by 40Ar/39Ar dating and corroborating palaeomagnetic data that the basaltic tuff on which the purported footprints are found is 1.30 +/- 0.03 million years old. We conclude that either hominid migration into the Americas occurred very much earlier than previously believed, or that the features in question were not made by humans on recently erupted ash. [2]

Assuming Renne’s team date is correct, then their first concluison is right, hominids migrated to America earlier than believed, and, if we consider the age of the footprint, then we can identify the hominid: only a Homo erectus could have left the Footprint at that time.

More footprints, photos and details at González website: http://www.mexicanfootprints.co.uk/

However the story does not end in 2005, recently, in May 2010, a new paper by González with Darren Mark [3] concedes that they:

have accepted that the age of the Xalnene Ash is approximately 1.3 (million years). Considering what we know about the timings of hominid migrations out of Africa up into Europe and Asia, it is highly improbable that hominids could have made it to the America's by 1.3 million years before present. [3]

That is, highly improbable according to the classic view of anthropologists. Perhaps it is not so, and we are only lacking proof of hominid migration prior to modern human’s appearance on the Earth.

Sources.

[1] Silvia Gonzalez and David Huddart, (2007). The Late Pleistocene Human Occupation of Mexico. FUMDHAMentos 7:236-259
[2] Renne, P., Feinberg, J.M. Waters, M.R., Arroyo-Cabrales, J., Ochoa-Castillo, P., Perez-Campa, M. and Knight, K.B., (2005). Age of Mexican ash with alleged ‘footprints’. Nature, 438, doi:10.1038/nature04425.
[3] Darren F. Mark, Silvia Gonzalez, David Huddart and Harald Bohnel, (2010). Dating of the Valsequillo volcanic deposits: Resolution of an ongoing archaeological controversy in Central Mexico. Journal of Human Evolution Volume 58, Issue 5, May 2010, pp. 441-445.


Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia
2011 International Year of Forests
2011 International Year of Forests Copyright 2009-2011 by Austin Whittall © 
Hits since Sept. 2009:
Copyright © 2009-2025 by Austin Victor Whittall.
Todos los derechos reservados por Austin Whittall para esta edición en idioma español y / o inglés. No se permite la reproducción parcial o total, el almacenamiento, el alquiler, la transmisión o la transformación de este libro, en cualquier forma o por cualquier medio, sea electrónico o mecánico, mediante fotocopias, digitalización u otros métodos, sin el permiso previo y escrito del autor, excepto por un periodista, quien puede tomar cortos pasajes para ser usados en un comentario sobre esta obra para ser publicado en una revista o periódico. Su infracción está penada por las leyes 11.723 y 25.446.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other - except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without prior written permission from the author, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review.

Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy before accessing this blog.

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

Patagonian Monsters - https://patagoniamonsters.blogspot.com/