Translate

Guide to Patagonia's Monsters & Mysterious beings

I have written a book on this intriguing subject which has just been published.
In this blog I will post excerpts and other interesting texts on this fascinating subject.

Austin Whittall


Showing posts with label oceanian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oceanian. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Oceanians & Denisovans, a new paper


A paper published in Science last week reported that Near Oceanians, that is, people living in the islands close to Papua New Guinea in Melanesia (New Britain, New Ireland, Bouganville, etc.) and the Solomon Islands, mixed with three different types of Denisovans and still carry their genes nowadays because they play a role in the adaptability and survival of these people.


This is the paper: Patrick F. Reilly, Stephen Rong, Daniela Tejada-Martinez, Samantha L. Miller, Audrey Tjahjadi, Chang Liu, Jared Akers, Alysa Pomer, Margaret E. Prentice, D. Andrew Merriwether, Françoise R. Friedlaender, George Koki, Jonathan S. Friedlaender, Steven K. Reilly, Serena Tucci. Long-term isolation and archaic introgression shape functional genetic variation in Near Oceania. Science, 2026; 392 (6803) DOI: 10.1126/science.adr6749


The authors state that they found "previously unidentified archaic sequence and three times more Denisovan sequence than previous studies... We uncovered evidence for introgression from three Denisovan-like groups into the ancestors of Near Oceanians, revealing a new twist on our interactions with archaic hominins." The Denisovan introgressions impact on genes that affect "TRPS1, a skeletal development gene previously found under selection in central African rainforest hunter-gatherers and highland Ecuadorians", and also genes invovled in immune system pathways.


The paper points out that bottlenecks and subsequent genetic drift, and isolation of the populations in the region have shaped their genetics, causing wide differences between different groups.


Regarding the Denisovan introgression, this study "found that Oceanic genomes carry ∼2.5-fold more archaic introgressed sequence from all origins per individual than European genomes... and 14-fold more Denisovan sequence per individual than East Asian genomes."


But, the distribution of Denisovan genes was not uniform, to the contrary, it varied "by almost twofold from the New Guinean Sepik and Goroka groups to New Britain’s Nakanai and the Polynesian outlier groups of Bellona and Rennell... Sepik individuals harbored the most Denisovan introgression, 25 times more than East Asians... In line with prior work, we found that the genomic proportion of Denisovan introgression in Island Southeast Asian and Near Oceanic groups increased with greater shared ancestry with New Guineans, with the Philippine Agta as the sole exception" (the Agta people carry a very high proportion of Denisovan genes with a very low New Guinean shared ancestry, perhaps an indication of admixture within the Philippines).


Neanderthal genes


Interestingly, the authors say there is a high level of Neanderthal admixture in this Oceanian population, and refer to table S6 in the Supplementary material. Checking the table I found that the highest Neanderthal content is found in the Surui people of the Amazonian region in South America! the second highest is found in the Santa Cruz islanders of Oceania. See the adapted image below, from Table S6 in this paper:


Neander and Denisovan admixture table

However, the authors downplay the highest levels of average Neanderthal genetic content found in these Oceanians by using the excuse of bottlenecks. See how the try to minimize or understate this fact: "We found that despite harboring 41% more Neanderthal introgression per individual and having ~45% larger sample size in our dataset, Oceanic genomes had 28% less Neanderthal coverage than Central and South Asian genomes (tables S6 and S7). One possible explanation for reduced archaic coverage is a population bottleneck after admixture, which would also lead to increased homozygosity of archaic tracts. In support of this, we found both elevated homozygosity of archaic tracts and 2.3 to 3.4% less archaic coverage than expected given per-individual levels of introgression in five Oceanic groups with bottleneck signals..."


Denisovans

As you can see, the Denisovan levels are highest in Oceanians, and those living in Island South East Asia, followed far away by Amerindians and East Asians.


The paper states that "Denisovan introgression likely occurred in multiple pulses from multiple distinct Denisovan-like groups... We recapitulated previous findings of introgression from two Denisovan-like groups in East Asians... and found evidence for introgression from three distinct Denisovan-like groups with differing genetic affinity to the Altai Denisovan into almost all sampled Oceanic populations... we show that these signals are more widespread than previously thought, highlighting the complex dynamics of Denisovan admixture with modern humans."


Implications


It is time to look at who the Denisovans were, and also, the route followed by the Neanderthal admixture into both, Oceanians, Amerindians and East Asians. We also need to understand more about the differences between the Densivoan populations. Their evolution in Altai, East Asia, and especially Sahul and Sunda. Their presence in American Native genes is also relevant.


The simple model of humans meet Neanderthals in the Levant on their Out of Africa migration and mingle with Denisovans on their trek along South Asia into East Asia and Oceania is missing something.


Denisovans must have been a thriving group, all along the eastern, central and southern regions of Asia, perhaps also, Oceania when they were met by Homo sapiens, smoke screens arguing bottlenecks, genetic drift, and isolation can't explain away the fact that a group in the Amazon jungle has the highest levels of Denisovan ancestry in the whole world.



Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2026 by Austin Whittall © 

Monday, April 6, 2026

A New March 2026: Paper on Archaic introgressions in Humans


March 2026 has seen plenty of research papers published regarding hominins! This post will look into another introgression paper, that found not one, but two separate admixture events with archaics. One took place within Africa before Modern Humans set out on their Out of Africa migration, the second one affected people in Melanesia and Papua New Guinea, Oceanians.


This is the article: Yulin Zhang, Arjun Biddanda, Sarah A. Johnson, Colm O’Dushlaine, Priya Moorja, (2026). Recovering signatures of archaic introgression using ancestral recombination graphs, nioRxiv 2026.03.03.709416; doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.03.709416


Introgression Inside of Africa


They detected a first admixture with a ghost (unknown population) that added genes from a "super-archaic lineage" into the ancestors of all humans (Africans and Non-Africans), because it took place before the Out-Of-Africa event, in Africa.


"The ghost lineage, with a divergence time similar to Neanderthals, could plausibly correspond to Middle Pleistocene Homo groups or African Homo heidelbergensis populations that directly admixed with modern human ancestors before the OOA dispersal. For the super-archaic lineage, one potential candidate —compatible with the split time of approximately 1.8 Mya— is Homo erectus, as suggested by earlier studies."


The authors admit that it could have been one, single event, or there could have been more: "additional episodes of gene flow among structured African populations may have occurred but remain difficult to resolve with present data."


They noticed that the introgressed alleles could have been modified due to the action of natural selection perhaps because they provided adaptative benefits.


The paper says that their software (TRACE) found the following archaic ancestry in contemporary people from different regions, where N is Neanderthal, and D, Denisovan:


  • Europeans. N: 0.99%; D: 0.03%.
  • East Asians. N: 0.97%; D: 0.10%.
  • South East Asians. N: 0.78%; D: 0.10%.
  • Oceanians. N: 0.73%; D: 0.66%.

But, apart from Neanderthal and Denisovan alleles they also detected an introgression from a "ghost" source distantly related to Neanderthals and Denisovans: "Ghost segments exhibit deep divergence in marginal trees and show nearly identical genetic affinity to both sequenced Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes, indicating that they originated from an unsequenced lineage equally related to both archaic groups."


It was found in all modern humans at frequencies that ranged from 0.49 to 1.1%. This includes Sub-Saharan Africans.

Africans have more unique segments

The interesting part is that although non-Africans and Africans share alleles of the ghost introgression, "...both East and West Africans harbor a greater diversity of unique ghost segments." The authors don't attribute this enrichment and divergence to a recent or ancient admixture with archaics after the OOA event. Instead, they attribute it to the bottleneck caused by the OOA that led to the loss of these variants, now only found in East and West Africans.

Dates

The calculated "coalescence time" between human and ghost genes is, on average, 830,000 years (95% CI: 0.61–1.27 Mya).


This data leads the team to conclude that "an unknown archaic population, which diverged over 500,000 years ago, introgressed into the common ancestors of all modern humans prior to the OOA migration, resulting in similar patterns of ghost ancestry in non-Africans and Africans."


Denisovans injected super-archaic ancestry in Oceanians


Then they found a second introgression!


Previous studies have suggested that Denisovans may have mated with a super-archaic hominin (possibly Homo erectus), and as Papuans, Melanesians, and Southeast Asians have the highest level of Denisovan ancestry (they admixed when humans reached Sundaland, and the Philippines), the researchers wondered if the admixing led to a flow of super-archaic genes from Denisovans to humans.


They looked for super-archaic alleles contained within the Denisovan segments found in modern Oceanians. Their analysis revealed the 0.73% of Neanderthal and 0.66% of Denisovan ancestry mentioned further up, and also, a 0.33% introgression of super-archaic "ghost" ancestry.


"we infer that the super-archaic segments embedded within Denisovan ancestry tracts contributed almost 0.3% of the total detected Denisovan ancestry in Oceanians. This estimate constitutes a very conservative lower bound on the true fraction of super-archaic ancestry, as our analysis is restricted to Denisovan-introgressed regions in modern humans, requires segments longer than 20 kbp, and excludes loci where the sequenced Denisovan carries super-archaic ancestry. Using the marginal trees in SINGER, we estimate the coalescence time between these super-archaic segments and modern human lineages to be approximately 1.77 Mya (95% CI: 1.13–3.98 Mya), consistent with earlier reports."


The age given above points at Homo erectus, who was present in Eurasia 1.77 Mya.


introgression
The two introgressions. Copyright © 2025 by Austin Whittall

I prepared the map above to show what the paper says: An archaic ghost population in Africa (red circle) admixes with Modern Humans prior to the OOA (blue circle). These introgressed modern humans go into Eurasia (losing some of the archaic alleles due to founder effects and bottlenecks, and also spread across Africa (violet arrows) where the archaic signal remains stronger, one group heads towards SE Asia, Sunda and Melanesia, where Denisovans (green) live. These Denisovans had previously admixed with a Super-Archaic (yellow) somewhere in Asia (dashed yellow line). (2) is the Denisovan-Oceanian admixture, and (1) is the admixture within Africa. The red population is linked distantly to Denisovans and Neanderthals.



Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2026 by Austin Whittall © 

Friday, December 26, 2025

INDEX for our Trans-Pacific Contact posts: Oceania to America


For those who are interested, this is an index linked to all of our posts about the possible trans-Pacific contact or voyages between Polynesia, Oceania, Melanesia, and America, in both directions, as it also includes American voyates to Polynesia. It will help you navigate the different posts.


Updated: 26 - Dec - 2025


Index


map of Pacific islands
The Pacific, Polynesia and Oceania.


Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2025 by Austin Whittall © 

Tuesday, November 25, 2025

Oceanians: Okewa in the Americas


My previous post mentioned Father Molina's point of view on the "Oceanian" presence in Patagonia c.500 AD. He also mentions Polynesian ceremonial clubs or "okewa". Today's post will explore other articles on these clubs in the Americas.


In 1930, José Imbelloni (1885-1967), an Italian anthropologist who lived and worked in Argentina, wrote a paper about the Okewa and other similar artifacts (Imbelloni, J. (1930). ON THE DIFFUSION IN AMERICA OF PATU ONEWA, OKEWA, PATU PARAOA, MITI, AND OTHER RELATIVES OF THE MERE FAMILY. The Journal of the Polynesian Society, 39(4(156)), 322–345. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20702331).


The paper includes several photographs and describes artifacts unearthed in Arkansas, California, the State of Washington, Oregon, Michigan, British Columbia (Canada), Mexico, Peru, Argentina,

Imbelloni discards "convergence" by which people in the Americas created artifacts that are identical to those manufactured in New Zealand by Polynesian people (" not only because I consider such a convergence improbable which supposes also a somewhat astonishing parallelism of creative stages; but also on account of a large number of purely morphological circumstances.")


Imbelloni concludes as follows:


"The fact is that to this day nobody has ever faced the phenomenon in its integrity, because statements were based on a few discoveries, and more especially on North American ones, without taking South America into account; and some other writers dealt with the subject with much lightness, accepting commonplace explanations. The difficulty was avoided: now by bringing to bear the criterion of “convergence” in accidental inventions to a degree unsuitable even according to Bastian himself; now by impugning the veracity of the evidence of authors and writers of the last generation, as regards the specimens I have not been able to locate in the Museums; now by supposing that everything can be explained through a transposition of labels and objects in the glass-cases of ethnographical collections.
Against all these presumptions we have seen that the specimens found and collected by me, in these pages show unity and congruence.
To North America belong the following specimens: five standard patu onewa made of green and brown stone; two bodies of patu which very probably were of the onewa type; one argillite patu with a two-headed handle, similar to the Chatham specimens; three specimens of the miti model; and several patu paraoa, shaped according to the pattern of New Zealand.
To South America belong the following specimens: four patu onewa and two okewa.
The discoveries are located all along the Pacific Ocean zone in the northern continent, as well as in the southern.
The area of spatular weapons comprehends in North America: British Columbia and the States of Washington, Oregon and California. It is not necessary to assume that the origin of Nos. 4 and 5 from Michigan is apocryphal. A well-known track led the Indian tribes from the west to the Great Lakes region, by following the courses of the rivers. As for the southern steps, they form an uninterrupted chain along another beaten track, the way of the Uto-Aztec wandering—California-Arkansas-Mexico.
In South America the same element becomes visible in Peru and Araucania. It is interesting to note that the form of the patu onewa prevails toward the north and that of the okewa toward the south; let us note also the identity of type in the territories placed on both sides of the Cordillera de los Andes: the Argentine Nequén and the Chilian Province of Cautin, two areas connected by a corridor, whose ethnological content defines them as two communicating vessels.
Thus, the facts are connected by a natural logic that links them and throws light upon them all; and I am quite ready with profound admiration for those ethnologists who, with the preconceived idea of denying the migration of cultures from the Pacific to America, will be obliged to display much ingenuity in refuting, or cloaking with smoky clouds, the simple nature of the facts I have stated.
I beg of the reader not to forget that this paper contains only the American discoveries of the mere family stricto sensu, and no other. We must likewise consider in separate chapters.
(a) The derivatives proper to the New World, and especially the two foci of Nootka Sound and Araucanía, so plentiful with local variations.
(b) The quadrangular ceremonial axes which are toki tikitiki in Mangaia.
(c) The acclimatization in America of the whole Oceanic system of words, customs, and hierarchies connected with the word toki.
"

American and Polynesian stone clubs
Sickle-shaped stone clubs, Polynesia and Limay, Patagonia. From Imbelloni J. (1930), Fig. 17

Alternative Explanations


Imbelloni mentions two of them: convergent creative styles in different cultures or misplaced labels on museum collection artifacts. There are more. See, for instance, Ivory, C. S. (1985). Northwest Coast Uses of Polynesian Art. American Indian Culture and Research Journal , 9(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.17953 Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2xk7z6b2).


Ivory argues that these artifacts in North America date from the late 18th century and are not older than 1778. During this period the natives living along the Pacific Northwest in the US and Canada (British Columbia, California, Oregon and Washington) were exposed to European goods and also to objects coming from Polynesia "especially those, such as the Tahitian gorget or the Marquesan club, which would enhance their status or prestige, or those like the Samoan club, which would be practical substitutes for implements in use in the culture. In both cases, the Native Americans sought not to change their culture, but to expand or enhance it through exotic, innovative or unusual objects. That these objects were Polynesian is not as important as the fact that they were both differentfrom and adaptable to Northwest Coast life."


Ivory also notes a pre-European⁄American contact through "the wreckage of Japanese vessels drifted on prevailing currents to the Northwest Coast some even with surviving crew members."


Imbelloni in his description of the Limay artifact pictured further up (See: Imbelloni, J. (1929). Un arma de Oceanía en el Neuquén. Reconstrucción y tipología del hacha del río Limay. Humanidades (La Plata, 1921) 20, 293-316. https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.2174/pr.2174.pdf), clearly states that he agrees with Juan Ambrossetti's 1908 publication about this same artifact, stating that "these American ceremonial weapons form part of the Polynesian culture."


The "Toki"


Imbelloni also noticed that the word "Toki" was used in Polynesia and among the Chilean Mapuche people to designate ceremonial axes or adzes. He wrote a paper about this (Imbelloni, "TÓKI" La primera cadena isoglosemática establecida entre las islas del Océano Pacífico y el Continente Americano, Revista de la Sociedad de Amigos de la Arqueología, 1931. V, 129-149):


"The phoneme toki extends unaltered from the eastern limit of Melanesia, through all the island groups of the Pacific, to the maritime territories of the two Americas, with a wide area of penetration into the interior of the northern continent, as well as the southern one, where the diffusion has followed the dual East and South direction, to the southern lands...
A more or less valuable part of the cultural heritage of the Native Americans is directly dependent on the migrations that the Pacific Islanders made to the west coast of America, fanning out from their last garlands of land, Hawaii in the North and the Marquesas, Paumotu, Rapa Nui in the South...
"


Further reading


Juan B. Ambrosetti, Clava lítica, de tipo peruano, del territorio del Neuquen, en Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires, tomo XVII (1908), p.229-231.
José Miguel Ramírez Aliag, Contactos transpacíficos: un acercamiento al problema de los supuestos rasgos polinésicos en la cultura mapuche. ISSN 0716-0887, CLAVA 5 1992, Museo Sociedad Fonck, Viña del Mar - Chile



Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2025 by Austin Whittall © 

Monday, November 24, 2025

Molina on the "engraved stones": Oceanian (Polynesians) in Patagonia


In the past, I have posted (see below for some links to these posts) about the strange engraved stones that were discovered in different parts of Chubut province, Patagonia, during the 20th century, and which were sent to the Salesian Museum in Rawson (their Facebook page), Chubut, and are exhibited there. See these pictures from their Facebook, they show the "engraved stones": Picture 1, Picture 2.


In his book "Patagonica" (online here), Father Manuel Jesús Molina mentions these stones and includes them as plates in his publication. Below are these images and his original captions are translated in each image's caption-


But first, let's read his interpretation of these engraved stones:


"Sculpture style - They are works executed in counter- and bas-relief on stone slabs of very different materials: granodiorite, granite, compact basalt, marble, sandstone, quartz pophyry. They have sulpted human figures seen from the front, and profile, animals, and birds, sometimes forming scenes; weapons and work tools; signs can be seen in the inscriptions that appear to be letters, the phases of the moon, and a symbolic sign that give mental uniformity to the works. In general they have a frame of lines or frets... Decorated (or not), axes and the oquewa [sic] belong to it... With this style is the engraved ceramic of Patagonia, especially in Chubut. The Rawson Museum preserves a slab of stone on which they have reproduced in basrelief different shapes of ceramic objects with their respective decorations. With them, came the engraved plaques, done many times on soft materials like volcanic tuffs. All this makes us suppose that this style is of oceanic origin as shown by the symbolic cross-shaped sign of its bearers. The painted skulls of San Blas would also belong to it, which bear the same magical sign that is seen among the oceanic creatures of the Marquesas Islands, and is engraved on the back of the mythical lizard and painted in red in a dotted circle at Punta Gualicho, in Lake Argentino. An old Alakulup tradition says that long ago, some very bad men arrived in large canoes. Their bodies were painted with large stripes, and they killed everyone they encountered. Surely, their gateway must have been Puerto Aysén; they must have crossed the Andes through Coyhaique and reached Lake Colue Huapi via the Mayo and Senguerr rivers, where they established their settlement. There they mixed with the Patagonians and reached the coast, which they traveled as far as the Paraná River, where they formed the Canals Frau Littoral Group. It can be dated to around 500 AD."


The Engraved Stones and their Captions


From Molina's book Patagónica Figures 70 to 79:


70 - Sculpture style: small bust whose pedestal exhibits sculpted emblems on its four faces - Salesian Museum of Rawson No. 737
71 - Sculpted art: small bust with an engraved pedestal with emblems on its four faces - Salesian Museum of Rawson No. 737

engraved stones
72- Three sculptures: in th emiddle, a "Mature Mere" with sculpted effigy and signs of 27x9 cm; to the left a trapezoidal slab of prophyrite of 26x19 cm with ostriches and their chicks; to the right a basaltic stone of 23x18 cm with an indigenous effigy and its emblems - Salesian Museum of Rawson, N. 752, 738, 751

rock art
73- Boulder with the figure of a strange animal represented with only two legs, inscription, emblems and frets - Salesian Museum of Rawson, No.742

stone scultped
74 - Three sculptures: in the middle a porphyrite axe of 20x14 cm found in chullucurá; to the right, cross with double border and emblems, in white marble of 14x12x4 cm found in Puerto Visser; to the left, oval with the portrait of a native, 15x12 cm - Salesian Museum of Rawson, N. 748, 746, 747

engraved slab
75 - Guanaco that looks at you on dark shale of 43x36 cm, with various emblems, the condor and a serpent. - Salesian Museum of Rawson, No. 743

engraved rock
76 - Black basalt slab of 54x29 cm with a perimetral border: a collection of naitve artifacts and emblems: the hunter wears a loincloth. - Salesian Museum of Rawson, No. 736

stone axe
77- Various artifacts and emblems

axes
78 - Axe in basalt with inscription and red paint. - Patagones, collection of Mrs. Julia M. De Serrano

79- Oceanic artifacts: 1. Okewa, of 27x13x3.6 cm (n. 204); 2. Okewa, of 18.5x 10.6x2 cm (n. 1297); 3. Triangular axe, of 18x14.5x2 cm (n. 1300). - Fancisco de Viedma Museum, Patagones

Okewa


When Molina mentions "Oceanic" he is referring to the Polynesians. The "oquewa" ini the text (sic) and "okewa" pictured above are the words used to designate polished rock clubs used by certain Polynesian groups such as the Maoris of New Zealand. They can also be found under different names, and made in wood, in different islands across the Polynesia.


In a future post we will look into the ceremonial clubs found in the Americas that hint at a Polynesian link or visit to the New World.


Visitors from the West


Molina mentions an ancient myth of the Alakaluf about canoes full of men painted with stripes that murdered their people. These myths could refer to European ships or expeditions from Chile southwards along the Pacific coastline which usually ended up with the Europeans killing the natives. A big canoe could equally be a Polynesian vessel or a European caravel or galleon. Bodies painted with large stripes could refer to clothes (the Alakaluf people just wore some seal skins).

My previous posts on these stones


The "Phoenician" stones were definitively not made by native Tehuelche or Mapuche people, they are very different. And we can therefore conclude that they are either:


  • Fake. A forgery, a hoax. That is: someone deliberately crafted these stones with "native" motifs, with the intention of making them appear as authentic native or Phoenician crafts (hence the use of Semitic letters), to sell them to gullible amateur archaeologists.
  • Genuine, made by some non-native people like European settlers. By genuine I mean that the persons who made them, did so for some religious, cultural, social reason, and left them behind when they returned to their homeland or disappeared (famine, illness, war). Probably some were made and sold for a profit, to fool those who bought them believing they were genuine native handicrafts.

The posts on these stones:
Tehuelche rock inscriptions. Comparison to "Phoenician" stones.
Phoenicians, Tehuelches, Patagonia and cryptozoology - Part 1 where I asked if "are they genuine or are they forgeries? If genuine, were they carved by the Tehuelche natives? or by someone else?"
Genuine Tehuelche "inscribed or engraved" stones
Analysis of Tehuelche - Phoenician - Celtic (?) intertwined snakes : Strange snakes of alleged Celtic or Phoenician origin found engraved on Patagonian rockss. Native or Semitic - Celtic art?
Cryptid on Phoenician - Tehuelche carving, a cryptid on a Tehuelche engraved stone with Phoenician symbols. (" a very peculiar stone which differs from the standard native artistic expression.")
Phoenicians and Hebrews in Pre-Columbian Patagonia


An Article on the Stones

The issue No. 171, of Argentina Austral, published in September 1945, (online here, see p.12) included an article "¿Eran nómades o sedentarios los Tehuelches?" (Were the Tehuelche nomads or sedentary?) by Father Justo M. Ducco. In it, he discusses these engraved stones, and includes more photographs of them, including more samples such as a tortoise in pink granite (pictured below).


tortoise sculpture

The article mentions the stone sculptures as follows (In it, Ducco, interviews Father Antonio F. Fernández, principal of the Rawson Salesian School, which served at that time as the "museum"):


"But what gives this Museum its unique character is the "Archaeological Collection," with its lithoglyphs that intrigue the observer. A dozen or more granite-porphyry plaques, exquisitely engraved in relief, with heads of indigenous people, animals of the region, tools, symbols, and probable inscriptions, surrounded by a geometric border like a fretwork. The stone chosen for these works is solid and fine-grained; diverse in color and composition. And there is an exception, a small marble plaque less than two square decimeters in diameter. [2 dm = 200cm2 = 31 sq.in.] The engraving, or at least its retouching, was executed by percussion with pointed stones, with the patience necessary to achieve impeccable forms and surfaces. Father Fernández tells me that other visitors, more or less dedicated to archaeological matters, expressed their fears that these lithoglyphs may have been brought from Peru in ancient times; or perhaps they are local works by European carvers. I spoke at length with the Father; we examined the plaques and other similar works repeatedly, including a small bust of an indigenous person; we exchanged opinions, suppositions, difficulties, and arguments; and finally, we synthesized our shared opinion in several statements, which I present and elaborate upon here.
1°) The objects are heavy, some of the plaques weighing up to thirty kilos, and the Father has seen some of even greater proportions. We therefore dismiss the suspicion of allochthonous origin, taking into consideration that during the time of their long migrations, the indigenous people lacked vehicles that would have allowed them to carry more than the bare necessities.
2°) Regarding the hypothesis of the European origin of these sculptures, we note first that not all of them contain a single example of an exotic theme. If Europeans had engraved or simply directed the engravings, they would have imprinted their concerns as foreigners on them.
3°) Nor does the horse appear among the animal figures, which can only be explained by accepting that these are productions from a time before the arrival of the Spaniards to our shores; since with the first founding of Buenos Aires, the wild cattle descended from the escaped or abandoned cattle already began to spread towards the pampas.
4°) None of the plaques have a symmetrical face, even if only approximately. Their creators were aware of symmetry, as evidenced by the perfection with which they reproduced the Indian heads seen frontally in low relief, with their fringed headbands and geometrically arranged necklaces; likewise, the turtles, arrows, and other naturally symmetrical motifs. But they were not concerned with symmetry as European or Europeanized artists were; therefore, the outline of the work, traced by a simple fretwork, and the distribution of the figures, lack intentional symmetry.
5°) The works show the work of different hands, as can be seen from the compositions, the details of their execution, and even more so from the fact that the sculptures were found in different, very distant locations. At first glance, the themes might seem repetitive, were it not for the fact that the objects typical of the Patagonian moorland were specifically few: rheas, guanacos, pumas, snakes, lizards, the sun, the four phases of the moon... and add to that two almost indispensable symbols: arrows, such as those found in the riding arenas in their most common and elegant form; and another symbol that leaves us intrigued: Something like a uniform club or a bundle of rods, with two radiating bows or ties, also uniform and without a terminal notch, the whole of which resembles a crude schematization of a lizard's body seen from above. To these elements of the sculptural compositions, we must add several small signs that appear to be hieroglyphs. And there is precisely one plaque that contains about twenty of them, as if it were a mnemonic or learning manual.
6°) It will be objected that, since these were "nomadic" Indians, we cannot attribute to them the perfection displayed by the carvers of these stones.
"


Next Post: Okewa in the Americas


In a future post I will explore the presence of these okewa in the Americas.



Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2025by Austin Whittall © 
Hits since Sept. 2009:
Copyright © 2009-2025 by Austin Victor Whittall.
Todos los derechos reservados por Austin Whittall para esta edición en idioma español y / o inglés. No se permite la reproducción parcial o total, el almacenamiento, el alquiler, la transmisión o la transformación de este libro, en cualquier forma o por cualquier medio, sea electrónico o mecánico, mediante fotocopias, digitalización u otros métodos, sin el permiso previo y escrito del autor, excepto por un periodista, quien puede tomar cortos pasajes para ser usados en un comentario sobre esta obra para ser publicado en una revista o periódico. Su infracción está penada por las leyes 11.723 y 25.446.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other - except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without prior written permission from the author, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review.

Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy before accessing this blog.

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

Patagonian Monsters - https://patagoniamonsters.blogspot.com/