Translate

Guide to Patagonia's Monsters & Mysterious beings

I have written a book on this intriguing subject which has just been published.
In this blog I will post excerpts and other interesting texts on this fascinating subject.

Austin Whittall


Showing posts with label Upper Paleolithic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Upper Paleolithic. Show all posts

Friday, January 9, 2026

Japan - America, Paleolithic links?


Continuing with the Japanese-American links during the early peopling of America, this post looks into a paper published last year (Madsen DB, Davis LG, Williams TJ, Izuho M, Iizuka F. Characterizing the American Upper Paleolithic. Sci Adv. 2025 Oct 24;11(43):eady9545. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ady9545. Epub 2025 Oct 22. PMID: 41124256; PMCID: PMC12542946).


This paper's abstract suggests a link between stone-tool technology in Japan and America, and says that people migrated from Japan via Beringia into America! These people played an important role in the American Upper Paleolithic (AUP).


"In North America, there are enough sites with relatively large tool assemblages predating ~13,500 calibrated years before the present (cal yr B.P.) to allow assessment of the underlying characteristics of their shared lithic tradition. Their shared technological features involve the use of dual core-and-blade and biface technologies similar to those in the Northeast Asian Late Upper Paleolithic. These dual approaches were often merged to produce small projectile points, including stemmed point forms using an elliptical cross-sectional ogive design. Similar dual lithic technologies are found in assemblages in northern Japan dating to ~20,000 cal yr B.P. We suggest a group with a similar lithic technology became isolated somewhere in the vicinity of the Paleo-Sakhalin-Hokkaido-Kuril region, developing genetically into ancestral American populations. Between ~22,000 and ~18,000 cal yr B.P., a subset of this population migrated along the southern Beringian and Northwest coasts into the Americas. By ~16,000 to ~15,000 cal yr B.P., they had become widely dispersed across North America."


maps
Map showing the locations of major physiographic regions discussed in the text (A). Map showing the location of AUP sites in North America discussed in the text (B).. Fig. 1 in Madsen DB, Davis LG, Williams TJ, Izuho M, Iizuka F., (2025)

It mentions an old site, Cactus Hil, in the southern part of Virgina, dated at 18,000 years BP or even earlier! Gault, in Texas, that is between 16.7 and 21.7 ky old.


The authors say that: "Given this wide distribution and the associated age range, we speculate that the initial occupation of lower-latitude North America likely occurred around 20,000 cal yr B.P... Paleogenetics suggest the founding North American AUP populations formed somewhere in Northeast Asia when North-Central Eurasian populations merged with East Asian populations sometime before ~20,000 cal yr B.P." (Note: American Upper Paleolithic is "AUP").


An oceanic voyage


The paper suggests that the Japanese people moved in boats:


"This migration may have taken place over the course of a thousand years or more, lasting 40 to 50 generations and involving a series of movements of people from one place to another relatively nearby location. This wave of advance population movement may easily have used short coastal voyages in waters between off-shore currents and the wave breaker zone and could have enabled such migrants to access coastal refugia, which became differentially available through time. If so, then relatively adverse environmental conditions may not have been an obstacle, especially because migration may have been difficult during any period of the LGM. Alternatively, the migration may have been rapid but also have occurred any time. By ~30,000 cal yr B.P., Upper Paleolithic seafarers were using sea-going vessels to access some of the outer islands in the Japanese archipelago, e.g., and were capable of negotiating the Kuroshio Current, one of the fastest in the world. This suggests that such experienced seafarers may also have been capable of handling adverse Pacific coastal currents. Either way, environmental constraints on the timing of the initial occupation of the Americas may not have been much of a factor... The precise location of the initial AUP population within the larger PSHK region or its margins remains unknown, but the northern Japanese island of Hokkaido is a strong candidate."


A very interesting suggestion indeed! Early peopling, by boat, using the same currents that pushed Japanese junks towards America during historical times.



Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2026 by Austin Whittall © 

Friday, October 31, 2025

20,000 year ago date for the peopling of America (Oct. 2025 paper)


A brand new paper published in ScienceAdvances on October 22, 2025 (David B. Madsen et al., Characterizing the American Upper Paleolithic. Sci. Adv.11, eady9545(2025). DOI:10.1126/sciadv.ady9545) compared the stone tool technologies in American and Northeast Asian sites and dated them analyzing their evolution, location and timing to conclude a window for the peopling of America.


The study finds that North American stone tools from sites across the subcontinent dated 13.5 to 20 ky arose from a style of projectile points that seems to have appeared originally in Japan, in Hokkaido some 20,000 years ago. So, they suggest that the North American core-and-blade and bifacial technology has its roots in NE Asia around this time, and was taken there as the first arrivals reached the New World.


The paper characterizes these tools as: "Both the core-and-blade and bifacial techniques were used to support the production of a variety of lanceolate and stemmed projectile points. These are usually small, often less than 5 cm in length but occasionally reach up to ~10 cm long at sites such as Cooper’s Ferry/Nipéhe."


Then, some 13,000 years ago, the Native Americans shifted to more sturdy stone tools, these were the Haskett and Clovis tools, for spears and javelins.


This is a clear indication that Clovis wasn't "First" after all.


The authors find that the dates stands somewhere around 20,000 years ago:


...we suggest that this initial migration occurred sometime about 20,000 years ago. Praetorius et al. (101), in a review of environmental conditions along the Pacific coast of North America, particularly variations in the strength of counterclockwise coastal currents, suggest that the most optimal times for a coastal migration during this period were between ~24,500 and ~22,000 cal yr B.P. and again between ~20,000 and ~19,000 cal yr B.P. Similarly, on the basis of an examination of faunal records from the same southern Alaska and Canadian coastal zone, Steffen (102) concludes that glacial ice cover “probably hindered” migration starting between ~23,300 and ~20,000 cal yr B.P. and lasted until ~18,900 to ~17,700 cal yr B.P. Together, these studies conclude that conditions were optimal for a coastal migration into the Americas sometime about 22,000 years ago, a time estimate compatible with our archeologically based estimate of sometime shortly before ~20,000 cal yr B.P.


The two references cited, Praetorius and Steffen can be found below:


101. S. K. Praetorius, J. R. Alder, A. Condron, A. C. Mix, M. H. Walczak, B. E. Caissie, J. M. Erlandson, Ice and ocean constraints on early human migrations into North America along the Pacific coast. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2208738120 (2023). Online.
102. M. L. Steffen, New age constraints for human entry into the Americas on the north Pacific coast. Sci. Rep. 14, 4291 (2024). Online.


Slowly but surely, studies are pushing back the date of entry into America. I am an optimist and expect even older dates to be accepted in the next decade (like 30-40,000 years B.P.).


Below is Fig. 9 from this paper, and I quote its caption fully. Surprisingly there were NO STONE TOOLS in Beringia between 15 and 39 ky! probably due to the fact that the sites are underwater, on the now submerged continental shelf.


chart and timeline
Fig. 9. Summary diagram showing the chronological relationships between lithic assemblages in the PSHK, Beringia, and the AUP. Note the complete absence of lithic assemblages dating to between ~30,000 and ~15,000 cal BP in Beringia. Note also that the common features of AUP assemblages appear several thousand years earlier in PSHK stone tool assemblages. Finally, note the chronological relationship between the stemmed and lanceolate points of the AUP, and the appearance of the larger, and more robust lanceolate Haskett and Clovis points characteristic of the later Western Stemmed Tradition and Paleoindian periods. Source and see it online


Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2025by Austin Whittall © 
Hits since Sept. 2009:
Copyright © 2009-2025 by Austin Victor Whittall.
Todos los derechos reservados por Austin Whittall para esta edición en idioma español y / o inglés. No se permite la reproducción parcial o total, el almacenamiento, el alquiler, la transmisión o la transformación de este libro, en cualquier forma o por cualquier medio, sea electrónico o mecánico, mediante fotocopias, digitalización u otros métodos, sin el permiso previo y escrito del autor, excepto por un periodista, quien puede tomar cortos pasajes para ser usados en un comentario sobre esta obra para ser publicado en una revista o periódico. Su infracción está penada por las leyes 11.723 y 25.446.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other - except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without prior written permission from the author, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review.

Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy before accessing this blog.

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

Patagonian Monsters - https://patagoniamonsters.blogspot.com/