Translate

Guide to Patagonia's Monsters & Mysterious beings

I have written a book on this intriguing subject which has just been published.
In this blog I will post excerpts and other interesting texts on this fascinating subject.

Austin Whittall


Showing posts with label Jomon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jomon. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Ancient Japanese influence in prehistoric South America


My previous post explored the junk shipwrecks and Japanese castaways found along the coast of Northwestern America (Alaska, Canada, the U.S), and also Hawaii. Today we will look into the ancient links between Japan and South America.


Back in 2014 I posted about the Jomons and Ecuadorian Valdivias, and mentioned a paper published in 1962 (Emilio Estrada, Clifford Evans and Betty Meggers, Possible Transpacific Contact on the Coast of Ecuador. Science135,371-372 (1962). DOI:10.1126/science.135.3501.371)


Betty Jane Meggers (1921-2012) suggested that trans-Pacific contact some 5,000 years ago, linking Japan and Ecuador. She based her hypothesis on the similarities between the Japanese Jomon people and the Valdiviann people of Ecuador.


In a paper putting forward this idea was published 60 years ago: Transpacific origin of Valdivia Phase Pottery on Coastal Ecuador (Clifford Evans and Betty J Meggers, XXXVI Congreso Internacional de Americanistas de España 1964, Vol 1, 1966), Meggers and her colleague Evans outline how the contact took place:


"Consolidation of evidence relevant to the origin of the Valdivia Phase leads to a reconstruction of events somewhat as follows. Some 5000 years ago the coasts of Japan and western America were occupied by small groups of people who subsisted by fishing and shellfish gathering supplemented by hunting of ter restrial mammals.
In addition to gathering of plants they may have taken initial steps toward cultivation.
Their tools and utensils though differing in details of construction were of similar kinds fishhooks awis choppers flakes sinkers hammerstones indicating a similar level of technological competence and a similar ecological adaptation.
In Japan sites are found not only along the coast but up river valleys into the interior where salmon fishing hunting of terrestrial fauna and an unusually rich edible flora seem to have approximated wild food conditions on the northwest coast of North America. Bones from the refuse indicate that deep sea fishing provided part of the food supply from early times and dugout canoes have been found that provide information on the type of water craft used.
If a boatload of Early Middle Jomon fishermen left the sheltering bays of Kyushu and went out into the sea off the southeastern coast in October or November they would have entered a zone with some of the strongest currents in the northern Pacific running northeastward at 24 43 miles per day. Records for the 40 year period between 1901 1940 tabulate 802 typhoons of which 130 were in October and 67 in November. A canoe caught too far from shore by one of these storms might easily be swept by the combined northeasterly pressure of wind and current far out to sea before control was regained. Even if the occupants retained possession of their paddles they might have been unable to turn back. During the month of November westerly and northerly winds pre dominate in the northern hemisphere and are steadiest and of greatest force between about the 40th and 55th parallels In addition the percentage of gales increases during November in high latitudes occurring at an average frequency of one every 8 10 days over the greater part of the northern Pacific except near coasts. A combination of these forces would have borne a canoe eastward along the great circle route which on a flattened map curves far north of Hawaii Records during the past century demonstrate the feasibility of such a drift vessel reaching land with living passengers after a voyage of 11 months (Sittig 1896 p 530). Indeed the possibility of survival would be stronger for people accustomed to living from the sea than for land oriented agriculturalists of more recent times. Arriving on the Ecuadorian shore the travelers were met or soon found by the local residents who presumably were living much the same kind of life as had been left behind on Kyushu fishing shellfish gathering a little hunting and gathering of plants for food and fiber. The results make it apparent that the newcomers were welcomed and incorporated into the community. In the process they introduced the art of pottery making and very probably new religious practices that are reflected in the Valdivia stone figurines. Other new ideas may also have been incorporated but no tangible evidence has been recognized The Valdivians quickly became skillful potters and in fact the most striking aspect of the ware is its superiority in quality and artistry to pottery not only of contemporary Kyushu but also of other very early ceramic complexes in the New World. It is an ironical fact that attempts to relate Valdivia ceramics to those of Guañape on the coast of Peru Monagrillo on the Pacific coast of Panama or Puerto Hormiga on the Caribbean coast of Colombia involve more tenuous comparative evidence than can be brought to support the inference of Jomon Valdivia connections.
Undoubtedly this situation if properly under stood would shed light on the kind of contact that underlay diffusion of pottery making both north and south from the coast of Ecuador.
"


The idea sounds interesting, and it also accounts for the "figurines" or female statuetes (Venus) found in Ecuador.


More recently (see Betty J. Meggers. 2005. The Subversive Significance of Transpacific Contact. The NEARA Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2 (Winter): pp. 22-29.), twenty years ago, Meggers mentions the common variety of Human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV-1), as "another pathology shared by Japanese and Andeans... which is transmitted between adult males and females by sexual contact and between nursing mothers and infants. Today, the highest occurrence in the world of carriers of the HTLV-1 antibody is in Japan, where it reaches a frequency of 6% in Kyushu... Among modern populations in the Americas, it is restricted to the Andean area. Like the parasites, a post-Columbian introduction is ruled out by its presence in the bone marrow of 1500-year-old Chilean mummies... Among modern carriers are the Nanoama, an indigenous group that lives on the lower San Juan River, which drains into the Pacific coast of Colombia."


Meggers added that a study sound genetic similarities between these Nanoma people and the Jomons: "A comparison of the global distribution of 13 genetic markers also identifies the closest affiliation of the Nanoama with people of Jomon ancestry in Japan."


Meggers also suggests that the bottle gourd (Lagenaria sicerania) was brought to America by the Jomons: "an Old World cultigen that appeared in the Americas ca. 6000 B.P.—was among the Jomon introductions is supported by its presence in Japan by the Initial Jomon Period."


Regarding the ceramics, Meggers pointed out "the discovery of another intrusive complex of similar age on the north coast of Colombia, known as San Jacinto."


However, not everyone agrees with this theory. For instance, Scott, G. R. et al., (2021). Peopling the Americas: Not “Out of Japan.” PaleoAmerica, 7(4), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2021.1940440, refute it, without mentioning the Jomons or Ecuador and Colombia. Instead it focused on stone knapping techniques which seem similar in both Jomon Japan and North America:


"A widely accepted model for the peopling of the Americas postulates a source population in the Northeast Asian maritime region, which includes northern Japan. The model is based on similarities in stone artifacts (stemmed points) found in North American sites dating as early as 15,000 years ago and those of comparable age in Japan and neighboring regions of Northeast Asia. Here we show, on the basis of data and analyses in biological anthropology, that the people who made stemmed points in northern Japan (labeled “Incipient Jomon” in the archaeological literature) represent an unlikely source population for the indigenous peoples of the Western Hemisphere."


Even the origin of the ceramics style is disputed, (Kanomata Y, Marcos J, Popov A, Lazin B, Tabarev A. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antiquity/article/new-data-on-early-pottery-traditions-in-south-america-the-san-pedro-complex-ecuador/8885FD3A582F285F93728325C4945B66. Antiquity. 2019;93(369):e17. doi:10.15184/aqy.2019.56), says it originated in a pre-Valdivian culture in Ecuador: "These new data on San Pedro pottery from Real Alto demonstrate its stratigraphical, typological and chronological identity as one of the earliest ceramic forms in the Americas, and they confirm the existence of Early Formative cultural variability in Ecuador." Meaning they may seem similar Jomon and Valdivian, but they have different origins.


Regarding genetics, as mentioned in my 2014 post, there are similarities regarding what then was known as the Y-chromosome haplogroup C3* (nomenclature has changed since then, but the concept is still valid). C3* is rare in America, it is found among the Jomons and also among Ecuadorian and Colombian people, but not elsewhere in America. Surprisingly, the Japanese C3* variant is different to the one found in Colombia and Ecuador.


The American variant is now known as subclade C-P39 (formerly C3b). A paper (Insights into the origin of rare haplogroup C3* Y chromosomes in South America from high-density autosomal SNP genotyping, Mezavilla et al., 2015) studied the matter: "C3* Y chromosomes were discovered in two nearby Native American populations from Ecuador. Since this haplogroup is otherwise nearly absent from the Americas but is common in East Asia, and an archaeological link between Ecuador and Japan is known from 6Kya, an additional migration 6Kya was suggested. Here, we... evaluate three hypotheses: a recent migration from Japan, a single pulse of migration from Japan 6Kya, and no migration after the First Americans... Our simulations revealed good power to detect recent admixture, and that ≥5% admixture 6Kya ago could be detected. However, in the experimental data we saw no evidence of gene flow from Japan to Ecuador. In summary, we can exclude recent migration and probably admixture 6Kya as the source of the C3* Y chromosomes in Ecuador, and thus suggest that they represent a rare founding lineage lost by drift elsewhere." The map below is from this paper.


map of Japanese migration to America
Hypotheses to explain the presence of C3* Y chromosomes in Ecuador but not elsewhere in the Americas. Green line: the chromosomes were carried by the First American founder population 15–20Kya, but have been lost by drift from other present-day Native American populations examined. Blue line: they were introduced from Japan by a migration identified by archaeologists around 6Kya. Orange line: they were introduced from East Asia in the last generation or two. The violet line represents an ancestral population that split around 25–27Kya into the ancestors of present-day East Asians and Native Americans, and is incorporated into the demographic model used in this work.. From Mezavilla et al. (2015)

They rejected the Jomon admixture 6,000 years ago yet mentioned that "The estimated TMRCA for the combined Ecuadorian C3* chromosomes was 5.0–6.2Kya. The finding of this haplogroup in Ecuador was surprising because C3* is otherwise unreported from the Americas (apart from one example in Alaska), but is widespread and common in East Asia."


The sensitivity of the study is low. Imagine a boatload of Jomon people mixing into Native Americans, they would represent a low percentage of the total population, the study is not sensitive enough to measure low introgression rates: "The power to detect ancient admixture at these levels therefore depends on the sensitivity to detect the reduced admixture in the present-day population. For example, if 0.1% mean population admixture can be detected in the present-day population, we have ∼80% power to detect 5% ancient admixture and ∼100% power to detect 10% ancient admixture. If, instead, we could only detect 0.5% mean admixture in the present-day population, we have ∼0 power to detect 5% ancient admixture and ∼35% power to detect 10% ancient admixture... Immediately after a pulse of 10% migration, almost all individuals in the Admixed population have >5% and >1% admixture. 6Ky later, in the present-day population, about 1% of the Admixed individuals retain 5% admixture, and about 17% retain 1% admixture. In all simulations, negligible admixture is detected in the Control population. Overall, we have good power to detect 10% admixture that took place 6Kya, and some power to detect 5% ancient admixture." The authors indicate that "had good power to detect 1% recent admixture and 10% ancient admixture, with some power to detect 5% ancient admixture" which seems rather high, surely the impact of Jomon people would have been lower, probably it was amplified by genetic drift. Perhaps their Asian genes added some immunity to the Amerindians and this gave them a selective benefit when confronted with Spanish-introduced diseases after 1492.


It is interesting to point out that the Valdivia people lived (see google map) very close to the spot (Manta) where Inca Tupac Yupanqui learned that people in big boats came to trade with the local natives, and which have been assumed to be Polynesians. But, what if they were Japanese? Merchants who had kept up the transpacific contact for millennia...



Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2026 by Austin Whittall © 

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Japanese Jomons and Ecuadorian Valdivians


I mistakenly identified Valdivia in Chile for the Valdivian Culture in Ecuador in my post on American C haplogroup. A kind reader pointed out my error (Thanks! one learns from ones mistakes) and this mini post is the outcome.


An article (Estrada, E., B.J. Meggers y C. Evans 1962. Possible transpacific contact on the coast of Ecuador. Science 135:371-372.) suggested that the Japanese Jomon reached Ecuador (a stray fishermen's boat perhaps) and transmitted some of their culture to the local Valdivian Amerindians.


This is a summary of the theory and what it generated


A clear example used to suppoert this theory is the incise pottery, shown below. Valdivian on the left, Jomon on the right:


Jomon and Valdivian pottery

Incised pottery is not rare, it is a global phenomenon, for examples of incised ceramics in other parts of the world see the Amerindian Guaraní in Buenos Aires, prehistoric Spain or Native Americans in the U.S or Sudan in Africa.


It was assumed that the Valdivian pottery appeared with this novel incise pattern all of a sudden and that it could be explained via a transpacific contact. However an older Valdivian pottery dated at 3,500 BCE more rudimentary and obviously local must have been the source of the later more complex ceramics. [1]


And then we have the "Venus" images. The Jomon made humanoid dolls in clay of different sizes and shapes, they span a long period from c. 10 to 2.3 kya. They were once thought to be fertility symbols, but may have been dolls. One is shown below. Clearly a voluptuous female with curves.


jomon venus
Jomon Venus

The Valdivians made their own Venus ceramics as from 3,100 BCE. Shonwn below, and clearly slimmer and differently styled. Why would the Jomon transmit their incised pottery but not their obese Venuse dolls? Simply because there were no Jomons in Ecuador.


Valdivia Venus
Valdivia Venus images

The Jomons in Ecuador still would not explain how Japanese C3* haplotpe got into the genome of Colombian natives. Furthermore the C3* in Colombian and Ecuadorian natives is not the same as the Jomon haplotypes.


Another scholarly critical opinion on this subject


Sources


[1] Henning Bischof and Julio Viteri Gamboa, (2006) Entre Vegas y Valdivia: la fase San Pedro en el suroeste del Ecuador. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Études Andines / 2006, 35 (3): 361-376 IFEA



Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2014 by Austin Whittall © 

Friday, June 27, 2014

Y chromosome haplogroup C Part 1

C hg. in America - seeking a link with Homo erectus


The most predominant Y chromosome haplogroup among Amerindians is haplogroup Q (92.9% frequency). But it is not the only one to be found among Native Americans, there is another one, haplogroup C, which is found at a much lower 7.1% frequency among indigenous American men. [6]


C haplogroup was initially deteced in America among six populations; the North American Tanana, Navajo, Apache, Cheyenne and Sioux, and the South American Wayuu of Colombia (n = 2) [6]. And, interestingly, the haplotypes of these groups reflected their peculiarly "patchy" geographical distribution and with two very distinct clades (Patchiness appears to be characteristic with hg C., its distribution in Indonesia, New Guinea and Melanesia is also patchy):


  • C3b is the sub-clade that is defined by SNP P-39 and is only found in North America which means that it did not arrive "early" (otherwise it would be uniformly distributed across the New World like Q hg.), this is supported by the fact that it is found among the "latecomer" Na-Dene speakers. Nevertheless, these North American haplotypes differ among the Cheyenne, Apache and Navajo, suggesting that they had plenty of time to evolve. They have been dated to a mean age of 13,900 years [6].
  • C3*, Paragroup. (C-M217, which lacks P-39) is the other sub-clade, and appears in Northwestern South America and, an individual of Tlingit origin in Southwestern Alaska (presumed to be of native ancestry).

C3* is not found elsewhere (i.e. Central, North or Southern South America) and has many mutational differences separating it from the C3b haplotype, "reflecting its marked divergence". [6]


The Odd South American distribution of C3*


C3* has only been detected in three populations in South America, [2] and at low frequencies: Gepper (2011) [3] detected only 6.2% (4 out of n=65):


  • Wayuu Colombia. (n=2) [6]
  • Waorani tribe, Ecuador, (n = 3) identical haplotypes but the men were from different families.
  • Kichwa speakers from Pastaza province (close to the Waorani villages) (n = 11).

Close but distant. Despite proximity the Waorani were a ferocious people and until the late 1950s, they did not mix with their neighbours. The haplotypes of Kiwcha and Waorani differ by many mutations which shows that both groups "survived for a long time in isolation from each other." [2]


The patchy distribution of the C3* paragroup among isolated tribal groups and the differences that exist within these groups is suggestive. Below is a table showing the C3* among the populations mentioned above, from [2]:



Wayuu, Tlingit and Waorani differ. Kiwcha and Waorani are similar except for last three individuals (whose divergence in repeat numbers I shaded darker).


The Asian link


C3* is found at relatively high frequencies all across East Asia: Koryaks of Kamchatka (38%), Mongolia (36-38%) and it drops to 10% in Korea and 3% in Japan, yet is high among the aboriginal Ainu of Hokkaido (15%). [2]


But the Asian and Amerindian C3* are not identical: a median-joining network analysis of the Y-STR haplotypes showed that the South American C3* carriers "belonged to separate and rather distant clusters at the periphery of the network [which included Asians] , suggesting that the time of the last contact between these two groups predated the time of the initial colonization of the Americas". In other words: an ancient common ancestor back in Asia. [2] (Also see Fig. 4 in [6]).


Furthermore the Tlingit C3* from Alaska belonged to haplotype H166, the Ecuadorian Kiwcha had H7 as the most frequent haplotype followed by H162, H163, H22, but had a "substantial distance to common Asian types". The Colombian Wayuu belonged to yet another haplotype, H165, "only distantly related to the Ecuadorians" [2].


Comment. C3* is a paragroup, which means that it clumps together all C3 haplotypes that do not belong to known haplotypes for which specific markers have been identified. Since we cannot tell them apart because the chips that analyze haplotypes do not recognize them as distinct, they are all clumped together as C3*.
In other words an individual belonging to C3* in Siberia may one day be assigned to a currently unknown C3x haplotype while the Amerindians may belong to completely different yet still unknown haplotypes C3y and C3z.


Nevertheless, Roewer et al., (2013) [2] propose that the C3* found in South America is of a recent Asian origin. They believe that its limited range within America is due to a late migratory event that crossed the Pacific in water crafts and reached the Ecuadorian coasts (a boat full of Japanese shipwrecked in Ecuador that marry into the Waorani and Kiwchas...).


But first, let's look at the phylogenetic tree from Roewer et al., is very interesting [2]:

C3* phylogenetic tree
Phylogenetic tree for hg. C3*. From [2]

Some interesting points: This is a paragroup (C3*) so it encompasses all that does not fit into the know haplotypes. In other words it may include yet undiscovered haplotypes. Having said this, some relationships are clear:


  • The Japanese - Korean cluster (at the bottom of the tree in shades of blue). Is quite diverse and definitively separate from the American cluster (red and pink dots). Within the Japanese - Koreans we find Chinese (orange), Tibetans (brown), Indonesians (black) and Mongolians (yellow). No siberians or Northern Asians. This may indicate relationship between Southern and Eastern Asian clades concealed within the C3* paragroup.
  • The Mongolians appear in two distinct groups, one at the bottom, under the Japanese - Korean cluster. The other rising from the central part on the right side. This one is mixed with Altaian, Siberian, Chinese (Anatolians - white dot) and includes the Colombian natives.
  • The Amerindian (and Alaskan) line appears on the left, in several branches born in the central cluster it appears related to the Siberians

It seems to me that there are several different haplotypes hidden in the C3* paragroup that have yet to be identified, but the Americans, but, it clearly indicates no relationship between Japanese or Koreans and the Amerindians which is what Roewer's team suggests below.


An improbable Transpacific origin


Let's follow their arguments:


As usual the methods employed are based on the expected orthodox assumptions: 15 kya migratory event into America and a 12 kya entry into South America. [2]


Limited Distribution. "If haplogroups Q and C3* both entered the American continent from Asia at the same time 15,000 YBP, then C3* would have been expected to be more widespread than has been reported so far." [2]. My counter argument is: it reached America in a very ancient peopling wave, long before the major 15 kya event and was overlaid by the Q hg. which proved more succesful and replaced it. Another option: as it is so ancient, it is found at extremely low frequencies and that is the reason for it being bypassed by the samplings performed so far in other parts of America, a clear bias (see my post on Biases in genetic models).


However, disagreeing with Roewer' team, Zegura et al., [6] do not support the notion of two separate founding events. Instead they attribute the lower frequency of C hg. to it being a "minor component of the Y chromosomes in the single founding population" and that its frequency and patchy distribution are due to "successive episodes of intragenerational and intergenerational genetic drift" [6] in other words, they were few to start with and became fewer as time passed (more on this in my post on genetic models).


Isolated range. Since the population that peopled America came from Asia and marched in a North to South direction, if any C3* was present in that founding group, it would have to also ppear in North America and Central America; it would also be expected to have spread across South America too, like the other mtDNA and NRY hgs. too.


Since it is not found in Mesoamerica or the rest of South America, and only one case has been found in North America, yet it is very frequent in East and Northeast Asia, they conclude that it is unlikely that the initial peopling wave or America carried C3* with it. They believe that it would not get lost in the North but survive in the South if genetic drift was the cause of its loss. They also consider it unlikely that the wave carrying C#* marched quickly across North America (leaving no trace there) to settle in the south.


They summarize it as follows: the very low frequencies observed in South America "are hardly compatible with a long period of joint immigration from Asia" [2]. See above for a counter argument: two separate migratory events where the new one overlays the older one and replaces it. This is not unknown and has been pointed out in Melanesia, precisely for another C paragroup found in Indonesa and Melanesia: mentioning its ancient roots and a lower frequency as due to a "... later waves of (partial) replacement." [4].


So as an explanation for C3* being found in Northewestern South America, they propose a transpacific nautical event c. 6,000 ya, but ignore the Tinglit C3* individual in Alaska... did the Asians cross the Ocean to Peru and then go up to Alaska? or was it the other way round? Why didn't they touch land in other places and leave their imprint there too?


The 6 ky date is based on a "comparatively recent coalescence of the C3* haplotypes from the present study". [2] As expressed in my critical post on genetic models), the whole issue of dating is, in my opinion pretty feeble, so I would place a big quesiton mark on that date estimate.


They do however leave a window open when they note that the Tinglit C3* may "mean that a North American origin of the Ecuadorian C3* haplotypes, albeit less likely prima facie, cannot be ruled out" [2]. This fits in with the scenario that I propose: Tinglit is an isolated relict of the once Pan-American C3* population, later overlaid by Q hg. males of a more recent migration.


They support the transpacific contacts with similarities in the ceramics from Japan and Valdivia in Ecuador (I edited my following comment based on an input from a Reader I had mistaken Valdivia in Chile for Valdivia in Ecuador. in Chile and "the close proximity of the spotty C3* cluster to the Valdivia site".Allow me to point out that the 5,200 km or 3,200 mi. that separate the C3* in Ecuador from Valdivia are, in my opinion not a Close proximity). By the way, how did the ancient Japanese mariners get to Colombia and admix with the Wayuu? That is not explained either.


New (02 July 2014), I posted on these Jomon and Valdivian contacts today so that you can make up your own minds.


Finally, and to overcome the notable differences between Amerindian and Asian haplotypes they argue that it was provoked by limited gene flow between populations and also point out that "The striking differences observed between the Y-STR haplotypes of Ecuadorian and Asian C-M217 (C3*) carriers would be explicable in terms of a long divergence time after the arrival." [in America] [5], which to me seems incompatible with the 6 ky date mentioned by them. It is not enough time to justify such diversity.


Summary: the Waorani and Kichwa in Ecuador and the Wayuu in Colombia carry a C3* paragroup not found anywhere else in America. This is an oddity that requires explaining other than a one-way-expedition across the Pacific in a boat that set off from Japan. Lets see what the Waorani and Wayuu can tell us:


C3* haplogrop map America
Map showing where C3* hg. is found in South America. Copyright © 20143 by Austin Whittall

The Waorani people


The Waorani or Wao people, are a small hunter-gatherer and horticultural tribe of about 1,750 individuals, that live in the Amazon jungle in Central Ecuador, South America. They are not a coastal group (which means the Japanese sailors would have had to trek inland, across the Andes into the Amazon to mate with them and get their C3* into the genome of the Wao people).


Their habitat is particular (a Pleistocene forest refugium) and is protected as a national forest. The Waorani are a highly inbred group due to their social customs: marriage with cousins is an accepted practice, [6] and social violence is the major cause of adult death (reducing availabile males for mating).


Their language -Waso Tiriro- seems to be unrelated to other regional languages, which also favors their isolation.


Besides this unique C3* NRY paragroup, they also carry a "Waorani-specific" mtDNA: A2s [6]. By the way, A2 mtDNA hg. has a strong North to South cline, similar to what would be expected for a Beringian entry and dispersal toghether with the NRY C3* hg. It is therefore likely that both maternal and paternal lineages are local and not recent arrivals from Asia.


Their isolation led them to retain this very rare paragroup which was lost elsewhere.


More on the Waorani


The Kichwa


Don't mistake them for the Quechua or Quichua, of Peru and Bolivia. These people are a native group of the Ecuadorian Amazonian jungles. Over 100,000 survive today. They knew the Quechua language after contact with the Inca empire and used it for trading purposes. The Spaniards dominated them and the missionaries imposed the Quechua language used in Peru on their new subjects.


They too live on the eastern side of the Andes, in the jungle.


More on the Kichwa


The Wayú o Wayuu people

They are a Arawakan speaking group. The Arawakans once peopled the Northern area of South America from the Orinoco River to the Caribbean Islands (Taino).


The Arawakans were the first group of Amerindians to meet the Europeans (1492) and died massively as a result. Fortunately, the Wayuu lived in the arid Guajira Peninsula shared by Colombia and Venezuela, on the Caribbean Sea; the harsh territory and the bellicose nature of the natives kept the Spaniards out. It was not until the mid 1800s that they were subdued and incorporated by both countries. This allowed them to survive without becoming extinct like many other native groups did.


They number over 300,000 individuals. The males can form polygamous families.


More on the Wayuu


Comments


All three populations have remained relatively isolated, the Ecuadorians due to their fierceness and jungle habitat. The Colombians due to their geographical isolation on an arid peninsula.


This allowed them to survive the massive deaths that followed contact with Europeans after the discovery of America and maintain rare C3* paragroup haplotypes in their genomes, haplotypes which have become extinct elsewhere. (Perhaps the sequencing of Caribbean Taino remains may yield more C3* sequences).


Their location seems to rule out admixture with Transpacific navigators, one is beyond the Andes in the Amazonian rainforest, the other is on the Caribbean sea, both are over 500 miles from the Pacific Ocean's shores.


It is extremely likely that the current patchy distribution and the extremely low frequences of C3* paragroup in South America reflects the remains of a once widespread lineage later overlaid by more recent migrants from Asia and which was seriously reduced due to the bottleneck provoked by the Conquest of America that began in the Sixteenth Century.


The few samples detected may preclude identifying special markers that would allow the definition of a new haplogroup within C3 and removing them from the C3* paragroup. But there is always the chance that wider sampling may yield more individuals that may alow a better typing.


In the meantime, we have the phylogenetic tree shown above which clearly indicates a very ancient origin of C. Notice the deep mixture of people from very distant geographic regions sharing the same haplogroup: Indonesian and Mongol at hg. H37, Ecuadorian Kiwcha and Siberian Koryak at H7, Korean and Indonesian at H158, arising from Chinese H64. Siberian and Indonesian (H1+H4+H5+H769). This is, in my opinion, a clear indicator of antiquity.


Let's remember that Homo erectus survived until quite recently in China and Indonesia, so it is not improbable that C hg. and H. erectus are related, especially since the root of the Y chromosome tree has been proved to be older than H. sapiens at 271 - 581 ky. (Mendez et al., 2013) [7]. Of course this date is probably too recent to mark the H. erectus input into our NRY lineages, but given my doubts regarding the calculations of divergence dates, it may be 4 times that value and therefore fit with the H. erectus OoA event.


As we will see in the next post, haplogroup C also has very deep roots in Asia, and C* also contains haplotypes that have yet to be identified.


Sources


[1] Stephen L. Zegura et al., (2004). High-Resolution SNPs and Microsatellite Haplotypes Point to a Single, Recent Entry of Native American Y Chromosomes into the Americas. Molecular biology and evolution 21: 164–175
[2] Roewer L., et al., (2013). Continent-Wide Decoupling of Y-Chromosomal Genetic Variation from Language and Geography in Native South Americans. PLoS Genet 9(4): e1003460. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003460
[3] Maria Gepper, (2011). Hierarchical Y-SNP assay to study the hidden diversity and phylogenetic relationship of native populations in South America. Forensic Science International: Genetics. Vol 5: 2, 100-104, March 2011
[4] Tatiana M. Karafet et al., (2010). Major East–West Division Underlies Y Chromosome Stratification across Indonesia. Mol Biol Evol (2010) 27 (8): 1833-1844. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq063 First published online: March 5, 2010
[5] Roewer L., et al., (2012). Identification of a novel Native American Y chromosome founding lineage in North-west South America. Congress; DNA in Forensics 2012. "DNA in Forensics: Exploring the Phylogenies"
[6] S. Cardoso et al., (2012). Genetic uniqueness of the Waorani tribe from the Ecuadorian Amazon. Heredity (Edinb). Jun 2012; 108(6): 609–615. Published online Jan 11, 2012. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2011.131
[7] Mendez et al., (2013). An African American paternal lineage adds an extremely ancient root to the human Y chromosome phylogenetic tree. Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Apr 4;92(4):637.



Patagonian Monsters - Cryptozoology, Myths & legends in Patagonia Copyright 2009-2014 by Austin Whittall © 
Hits since Sept. 2009:
Copyright © 2009-2025 by Austin Victor Whittall.
Todos los derechos reservados por Austin Whittall para esta edición en idioma español y / o inglés. No se permite la reproducción parcial o total, el almacenamiento, el alquiler, la transmisión o la transformación de este libro, en cualquier forma o por cualquier medio, sea electrónico o mecánico, mediante fotocopias, digitalización u otros métodos, sin el permiso previo y escrito del autor, excepto por un periodista, quien puede tomar cortos pasajes para ser usados en un comentario sobre esta obra para ser publicado en una revista o periódico. Su infracción está penada por las leyes 11.723 y 25.446.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other - except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without prior written permission from the author, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review.

Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy before accessing this blog.

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

Patagonian Monsters - https://patagoniamonsters.blogspot.com/