Guide to Patagonia's Monsters & Mysterious beings

I have written a book on this intriguing subject which has just been published.
In this blog I will post excerpts and other interesting texts on this fascinating subject.

Austin Whittall

Friday, October 16, 2009

Iemisch the Patagonian Water Tiger


«Let it be said at once that the Indian tales of the “Iemisch” or “hyminche”, if not invented to amuse the stupid white men, were simply myths with no foundation in reality».
George Gaylord Simpson.[1]

I devoted a chapter of my book to this subject (Chapter X - Ameghino’s “Iemisch”, the Patagonian “water tiger”), in this post I inclulde some of that chapter's text.

Patagonian Monsters Book
The Book - Chapter X. Copyright © 2010 by Austin Whittall

George Gaylord Simpson was perhaps the most influential paleontologist of the twentieth century and a very harsh critic of cryptozoology. Having visited Patagonia several times in the 1930s he was in a position to give his personal opinion on the Iemisch myth, which, as we see above, he did relentlessly.

But what was the Iemisch?

As a consequence of the Mylodon Cave findings, another Patagonian beast became known, the Iemisch or Yemisch. It was first mentioned in Ameghino’s 1898 mylodon paper (see my post on the Neomylodon Listai: The Mylodon Saga).

He said that the Tehuelche had informed his brother Carlos about a mysterious and aggressive creature, the Iemisch, which roamed Patagonia:

Mysterious four legged massive beast, of a terrible and invulnerable appearance, whose body cannot be penetrated by missiles or brning branches. They call it Iemisch or "water tiger" and mentioning its name terrorizes them; when interrogated and asked for details, they become grim, drop their heads, turn mute or evade answering.[2]

He then went on to add that it was not a myth, but a real being, and that when his brother had sent him the skin of a mylodon he had included the following letter, which we quote fully below:

At last I have managed to get from the Tehuelche Indians, some precise data on the famous Iemisch, which is not a myth or a ghost as we have thought, but something that truly exists.

I have seen an Indian who had a piece of Iemisch hide that has tiny bones embedded in it; which I am sending to you, similar to the fossilized ones we found in mylodon skeletons; and Hompen, another Tehuelche Indian, has told me how, while going by Senguer [River] in Santa Cruz, met a Iemisch on the road, that closed his way, and fought with it, killing it by hitting it with his bolas. According to them, it is amphibious and walks on land with the same ease as it swims in the water. It is now confined to the central Patagonia, in caves and protected areas along the shores of Colhue, Fontana [and] Buenos Aires lakes, and Senguer, Aysen and Huemules rivers, etc., but that according to tradition, they used to extend in other times to the north up to the Negro river, and on the south, according to what old Indians can remember it lived in all the lakes of the oriental foothills of the Andes up to the very Strait of Magellan.

About half a century ago [1848], an Iemisch that was coming down the Santa Cruz River from the Andean lakes, landed on the northern shore of the river close to Pavón Island; the terrified Indians ran inland, and since then as a remembrance of this unexpected apparition, this abandoned place still today bears the name of "Iemisch-Aiken" (place or location of the Iemisch).

It is a creature of the night, and they say that it is so strong that it grabs on to horses with its claws dragging them into the water. According to the description that they gave me, it has a short head, large fangs and its external ears are lacking or rudimentary; short and flat feet (plantigrade) with three fingers on its front paws and four on the rear ones, joined by a natatory membrane and with formidable claws. The tail is long, depressed and prehensile. The body is covered with short, hard and rigid hairs, of a uniform brownish color. The size is said to be larger than that of a puma, but with shorter legs and a much thicker body.[2]

Thus Ameghino contended that his Neomylodon and Iemsich were the same creature. Could he have been correct in his assumption?

Ameghino’s paper was soon quoted by Florencio de Basaldúa -interim governor of the Patagonian Territory of Chubut- in the article Monstruos Argentinos (Argentine Monsters), published in the Buenos Aires magazine Caras y Caretas on May 13, 1899. In it Ameghino is cited as stating that he had got a Iemisch hide from “the shores of lake Colhue Huapi, hunted and killed by the Indian Hompen, that lives there”.[3]

It should be noted that Senguer River flows into Colhue Huapi Lake, where as recently as 2001, there have been sightings of a strange bulky aquatic being (see our post on the Lake Colhue Huapi creature)

Real or made up?

Surprisingly, before Ameghino, not one single Patagonian explorer had ever mentioned the Iemisch; and we have no other records of any Aonikenk myths referring to an animal named Iemisch.

To be fair, there are references to Aonikenk monsters such as Goshg-e, which though not described as aquatic, was very similar to the Iemisch in its dreadful size and aggressiveness.

For this reason, Ameghino’s Iemisch was quickly under attack by other scientists, so he was forced to defended himself. In a letter dated April 4th, 1901 to German-Brazilian Dr. Herman von Ihering he said that “the references to Jemisch [sic] are exploited in ill faith. I have not described the Neomylodon by references but from the mentioned bones […] and simply referred the descriptions of a large mammal that inhabits the Patagonian lakes […] if these descriptions are not reliable, the blame is not mine […] Probably there is not only one mysterious mammal living in Patagonia, but several”.[4]

In his letter he enclosed a clipping of the Buenos Aires daily La Nación, in which his witnesses were not voluble natives, but supposedly more reliable “white people”. Regarding the article, Ameghino noted that “Steinkanpen was accompanied by two cow hands by the name Montesinos who live in Chubut and two sons, one aged 18, the other 16. The five of them saw the monster. Mr. Zubizarreta was accompanied by several soldiers. I have spoken to others who have shot at Jemish [sic] from a distance of 3 meters [9 ft.]”.[4]

Shortly before, on March 3rd, 1901, his brother had written to him cheerfully “it seems that the mylodon has been seen this time in the mountains by the Gallegos River by neighbors of that place, and it is not improbable that any moment we may get the news that it has been hunted. This time it seems to me that it is true and serious”.[5]

De Basaldúa was also on the look out, and in July 1901 wrote to Florencio that he was corroborating “very important news on the Neomylodon Listai”.[6]

What came of these leads no one knows. There is no further correspondence on the matter, Neomylodon and Iemisch vanished.


During his 1900 Patagonian expedition, French naturalist André Tournouer saw a creature emerge in the middle of a stream, its round head was the size of that of a large puma, with dark fur. Its eyes were encircled with light yellow hair. It lacked external ears.

He shot at it and the animal quickly disappeared under the water. He later came across some large cat-like tracks in the sand.

His native guide seemed very frightened and told him that beast and tracks belonged to the mysterious Hymché.[7][8]

Tournouer was certain that it was not a Neomylodon and believed that it was a carnivore.[9]

Perhaps Iemisch and Hymché were the same creature. But what was it? Ameghino also called the Iemisch a “water tiger”; which, unlike the Iemisch, is mentioned in several native’s myths. We will look into the water tiger in our next post.

[1] Simpson. G., (1934). Attending Marvels: A Patagonian Journal. New York: Mc Millan. pp. 265-6.
[2] Ameghino, F. (1899). El Neomylodon Listai un sobreviviente actual de los megaterios de la Antigua Pampa. La Pirámide. La Plata. v. 1:51. 15.06.1899. An online Spanish version Here.
[3] Vallmitjana, R., (2003). Monstruo del lago. Bariloche: Author’s Edition. pp. 2.
[4] Torcelli, A., [Ed.] (1913). Obras completas y correspondencia científica. La Plata: Taller de impresiones oficiales. v. 22: 27 -28.
[5] Ibid. pp. 7.
[6] Ibid. pp. 364.
[7] Lehmann-Nitsche, R., (1902). La pretendida existencia actual del grypotherium. Supersticiones Araucanas referidas a la lutra y al tigre. Revista del Museo de La Plata. T.X. 28. pp. 271+
[8] Tournouer, A., (1901). Sur le Néomylodon et l’animal mystérieux déla Patagonie. Comptes rendus des séances de L’Académie des Sciences de Paris, 14 janvier 1901. — Extr. 2 pp.
[9] Ameghino, F., (2006). Reseñas de la Patagonia: andanzas, penurias y descubrimientos de dos pioneros de la Ciencia / Florentino y Carlos Ameghino. B. Aires: Continente-Pax. pp. 130.

Copyright 2009 by Austin Whittall ©

Patagonian Monsters


  1. Excellent site and very matter of fact. The toe configuration fits with that of an odd-toed ungulate (4 front, 3 back) the same as the Beast of Gevaudan etc imo. Also fits with African Nandi Bear suggesting a common ancestor before the continents parted some 110 million years ago. (amlowey*AT*

  2. Thank you for your comment. It is very interesting and has set given me additional proof to my "Patagonian tapir" hypothesis which I posted in three separate entries. After all, tapirs are odd-toed ungulates too.

  3. hello there Austin , this is an interesting article , my wife and I live in Puerto Natales and were travelling back into Natales in the early hours of the morning on route 9 , when an animal crossed in front of us and I braked to avoid hitting it (it was a close call as I had to reverse to check I had been quick enough ) when I had done so we both saw that it was something we had not seen in the area before ,(my wife was born and raised in Natales ) after searching the internet for Patagonian wild life and having no luck with a match , I stumbled upon your site today and the illustration is incredibly close to what we saw ,the other strange thing about this encounter is that the animal showed absolutely no signs of fear given the fact that we had almost hit it with our 4wd , it just continued on its way as if oblivious to our presence , the animal we saw seemed to be heavier than the illustration ,It almost appeared pregnant? as it had a waddle to its gait ,just thought we would let you know about this encounter and would be interested to hear your comments on this

    1. Thank you for taking the time to share this interesting close encounter with us all.
      How big was it? The only other option I can think about based on your comment about it being heavy is that it may be a beaver.
      Beavers were introduced into Tierra del Fuego by the Argentine navy to make pelts and then set free!! they are now a scourge in the Isla Grande and moving north along the coast. They have reached the mainland and even spotted close to Puerto Natales.
      See the article (it has a photo too) on one caught close to P. Natales.
      Do any of our readers have any suggestions?

  4. Hello there Austin , thanks for your feed back on this , with reference to your suggestion of this been a beaver , the animal we saw had a long thin tail ,not wide and short as you would expect to see on a beaver , and as for the size ,it was about the size of a small dog and was quite close to the ground , as mentioned before the impression you have of the lemisch in your gallery is almost identical to what we encountered on route 9 , and the fact that this was not a fleeting encounter leaves us a bit puzzled as to what it may have been , perhaps the lemisch is still around in Chilean Patagonia?

  5. Maybe it is a Huillin, the Patagonian otter. Quite rare and not often seen.
    A picture can be found here...

  6. Ok, I have reviewed the data and posted something new:


Hits since Sept. 2009:
Copyright © 2009-2018 by Austin Victor Whittall.
Todos los derechos reservados por Austin Whittall para esta edición en idioma español y / o inglés. No se permite la reproducción parcial o total, el almacenamiento, el alquiler, la transmisión o la transformación de este libro, en cualquier forma o por cualquier medio, sea electrónico o mecánico, mediante fotocopias, digitalización u otros métodos, sin el permiso previo y escrito del autor, excepto por un periodista, quien puede tomar cortos pasajes para ser usados en un comentario sobre esta obra para ser publicado en una revista o periódico. Su infracción está penada por las leyes 11.723 y 25.446.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means - electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other - except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without prior written permission from the author, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review.

Please read our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy before accessing this blog.

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

Patagonian Monsters -