tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8137409915847697670.post2186072107658527809..comments2024-03-17T18:41:00.382-03:00Comments on Patagonian monsters: Ancient H. erectus introgression into Denisovans and NeanderthalsAWhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11389280995003336103noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8137409915847697670.post-31660312021334285962020-10-02T12:52:11.675-03:002020-10-02T12:52:11.675-03:00Allhough hypothetical, The first Human aka Adam wa...Allhough hypothetical, The first Human aka Adam was kicked out of 'Paradise' (which was NOT Africa) into Africa from where the first human migrated towards Sunda-Land (Southeast Asia) and Sahul-Land (Australia, Tasmania + Papua Island).<br />In Sunda-Land and Sahul-Land the so-called Homo Erectus (evolved from closely related relatives of the first human / Adam) came into existence (Noah - second Adam?).<br /><br />At one point in time Sunda-Land and Sahul-Land flooded because of rising sea-levels (Noah's Flood story?) which caused Homo Erectus (Noah - Second Adam?) to migrate out of Sunda-Land (and out of Sahul-Land?) into Northern Southeast Asia than westwards into South Asia and Asia Minor / Middle-East in the region of Ararat where they mixed with the Neanderthal.<br />From the locality of Ararat the mixed Homo Erectus-Neanderthal migrated soutwards into (East-)Africa (INTO Africa hypothesis of at least the offspring of the second Adam which is Noah), westwards into Europe and north(-east)wards through the Caucasus into Eurasia. While Homo Erectus-Neanderthal in Europe stayed more or less unmixed the Eurasian Erectus-Neanderthal mixed with Denisovans and migrated further east into East Asia.<br />Eventually Homo Erectus-Neanderthal in Africa evolved into Homo Sapiens and spread out of Africa (about 50-60k years ago) and mixed with Erectus-Neanderthal in Europe and mixed with Erectus-Neanderthal-Denisovan in Eurasia into East Asia and beyond (Oceania and Americas).<br /><br />In this scenario it could be that the pre-Homo Sapiens (Erectus?) in Sahul-Land was the actual 'Noah' while his offspring migrated towards the west into the Ararat mountain region.<br /><br />Another interesting indirect link to this scenario could come from some so-called Egyptologists / linguists ;mohamed ibrahim and yousef awyan; who translated a name from some disputed hieroglyphs also known as Gosford Glyphs found in Australia as meaning PENU.<br />If PENU is actually Pen Nu, could it infact be Ben Nu(a)/Noa/Noah?) or in other words mean 'House of Nu/Nua/Noa/Noah?.<br />It would make sense; indigenous people on various islands (and lands/continents?) surrounding Australia are often known by Austronesian speaking people/population as 'Orang Benua', 'Anak Benua', 'Tangata Whenua'; basically meaning people (also children) of the land and possibly meaning people / children of the house of Noah; giving Noah's Flood story (into Ararat?) credibility.<br />Further more, there are many similarities in art forms between Gobekli Tepe in southern Turkey (southwest off mount Ararat) and Australian Aboriginal art.<br /><br />Hope the info is of any help. - Urisahatu -<br /><br />Links - Gosford Glyphs Analysis:<br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsG1C-52MCI - Part 1<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1SRpziFSCg - Part 2<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjg-l3DnzjY - Part 3<br />-------------------<br /><br />Links - Gobekli Tepe (Southern Turkey) comparison Australian Aboriginals:<br />ancientnews.net/2017/10/13/a-global-aboriginal-australian-culture-the-proof-at-gobekli-tepe/<br /><br />http://ancientnews.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/AboriginalGobekli.jpgAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8137409915847697670.post-75631483244699504052020-09-22T17:11:39.328-03:002020-09-22T17:11:39.328-03:00 Very interesting research (and your remarks too),... Very interesting research (and your remarks too), as further light is shed on what could have happened in Asia/Eurasia in terms of genus Homo evolution at Mid/Mid-Upper Pleistocene ages… a complex scenario of interactions comprising at least three “actors” ; the well known Neanderthals, the enigmatic Denisovans (a “sister lineage” of the former, though clearly differentiated genetically)… and the “omnipresent” H. erectus, the Homo species with the widest geographic and chronological dispersion.<br />I speculate that not only these species could have perfectly admixed between each other (Far Eastern transitional species may provide support on this), but also that H. erectus could have had a major role in this interchange of genes…<br />What is particularly interesting to me too, is that all this happened in contemporaneous ages with Africa´s evolution (its “own” one, in my tentative opinion) towards its first prototypes of Homo within H. sapiens parameters.<br />Needless to say, is that further acknowledge on the degree of relation between these two scenarios (Asia/Eurasia´s and Africa´s) will help to clarify this still diffuse panorama.<br />Best regards<br />Marcelo<br />Marcelo Bruyerehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05485948808541641877noreply@blogger.com